18 Comments
User's avatar
Drunk Wisconsin's avatar

I can't wait to be politely declined!

Peter Banks's avatar

We can forward the rejection letter preemptively if that would help.

PAtwater's avatar

This is the kind of dad humor that I'm here for.

William Miller's avatar

😭 we genuinely loved your proposal

Drunk Wisconsin's avatar

All jokes!

Elias Beamish 「 The Void 」's avatar

Oh this is going to be so much fun. I'm already running through a structure and idea in my head. Really excited to see what everyone comes up with!

Peter Banks's avatar

Extremely excited to read it! If you ever want a thought partner feel free to reach out to me :)

John Bolt's avatar

One idea I have is to attack and defund the universities and fire thousands of qualified experts from the bureaucracy. Surely nothing will go wrong

Synthetic Civilization's avatar

The U.S. doesn’t lack ideas.

It lacks mechanisms that reliably convert decisions into outcomes.

That feels like the real bottleneck.

Reid's avatar

Finished my submission. I think the quality of the lowest common denominator elite hasn't kept up with our increasing demand for a higher fraction of the population to be elites. That's nonlinearly decreased elite functioning.

https://rdoctor.substack.com/p/elites-are-like-fissile-material

PAtwater's avatar

Why a "post-Boomer" world? How does that connect to Boyd's thought?

Mark Taylor's avatar

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers"

-Shakespeare

Philippe Gosselin's avatar

You’re asking how America can get better at solving problems, but your model avoids doing any thinking or taking any responsibility. Ideas are crowdsourced, writers/innovators take all the risk on their own platforms, and the Institute steps in only to decide what gets through the gate. That isn’t problem-solving, it’s gatekeeping.