Safetyism and Techno-optimism aren’t the only options for dealing with AI risks. Technorealism is the framework needed to guide us through these issues.
I’m getting turned off by your approach to commenting. To answer you one final time, these are risks that should be taken seriously. I would not categorize them as existential but they could be systemic and should be taken seriously based on evidence.
Our Technorealism article isn't about Peter Thiel or his views, so I am not going to address the Vox article's argument even though it is a straw man. It doesn't pertain to this article. Technorealism explicitly recognizes the state as necessary and something that cannot be ignored. It also recognizes collective action to address risks as they arise.
This is addressed in the essay. Technorealism acknowleges the disruptive effects of technologies and is willing to deal with them pragmatically.
I’m getting turned off by your approach to commenting. To answer you one final time, these are risks that should be taken seriously. I would not categorize them as existential but they could be systemic and should be taken seriously based on evidence.
Our Technorealism article isn't about Peter Thiel or his views, so I am not going to address the Vox article's argument even though it is a straw man. It doesn't pertain to this article. Technorealism explicitly recognizes the state as necessary and something that cannot be ignored. It also recognizes collective action to address risks as they arise.